Public space planning in minor historic centres exposed to seismic risk: lessons learnt from the experience in Navelli (AQ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6093/2531-9906/10031Keywords:
Post-earthquake planning, Minor historic centre, Vulnerability, Accessibility, Public spaceAbstract
Risk reduction in minor historic centres exposed to seismic hazards is essential for the protection of life and cultural heritage but also for social and economic development and requires appropriate strategies. The current state of knowledge and technology suggests that intervention on sensitive mitigation of urban systems vulnerability is the most desirable solution to prevent the devastating earthquake’s effects. This requires a careful planning of both built and public spaces. Within this framework, the contribution illustrates an integrated methodology that accompanied the drafting of the Reconstruction plan of Navelli (AQ) and Civitaretenga, drawn up in response to the earthquake that struck the Abruzzo Region in 2009. Although dated, this methodology can be considered a best practice due to the innovative systematic assessment of both built heritage and open space in the two historical centres, supported by an Integrated Information System (IIS). An innovative approach to the assessment of vulnerability and accessibility of public spaces is also introduced. Monitoring the first outcomes of the Plan implementation provides a pretext for a critical reflection, about 10 years later, on the role of post-earthquake planning tools and on the evident relations or gaps between the scientific and technical contribution of the university and ordinary reconstruction processes in minor urban centres, generally prioritising interventions on the built heritage over the public space.
Downloads
References
Bernardini, G., D’Orazio, M., & Quagliarini, E. (2016). Towards a “behavioural design” approach for seismic risk reduction strategies of buildings and their environment. Safety Science, 86, 273-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.010.
Bernardini, G., Lucesoli, M., & Quagliarini, E. (2020). Sustainable planning of seismic emergency in historic centres through semeiotic tools: Comparison of different existing methods through real case studies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101834. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101834.
Bonotti, R., Rossetti, S., & Montepara, A. (2019). L’analisi dei percorsi nei centri storici esposti al rischio sismico. In P. Ventura, A. Montepara, & M. Zazzi (Eds.), La città storica post sisma. Memorie, prassi e immagini della ricostruzione di Navelli e Civitaretenga (pp. 173-191). Parma: Grafiche STEP Editrice.
Brando, G., Cianchino, G., Rapone, D., & Spacone, E. (2021). A CARTIS-based method for the rapid seismic vulnerability assessment of minor Italian historical centres. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63, 102478. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102478.
Damianakos, D., Ventura, P., & Zavrides, N. (Eds.). (2011). Minor Communities and Natural and Cultural Heritage: an Asset or a Liability? Milano, Italy: McGraw-Hill.
De Martino, G., Di Ludovico, M., Manella, A., Speranza , E., Fico, R., Provenzano, S., . . . Dolce, M. (2023). Reconstruction process after 2009 Abruzzo earthquake outside and inside historical centers: funding models and strengthening costs. Structural Integrity Procedia, 44, 1800-1807. doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.230.
Juliá, P. B., Ferreira, T. M., & Rodrigues, H. (2021). Post-earthquake fire risk assessment of historic urban areas: A scenario-based analysis applied to the Historic City Centre of Leiria, Portugal. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 60, 102287. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102287.
Lu, X., Yang, Z., Cimellaro, G., & Xu, Z. (2019). Pedestrian evacuation simulation under the scenario with earthquake-induced falling debris. Safety Science, 114, 61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.028.
Manella, A., Genitti, C., Corsi, F., & Frezzini, F. (2016). First analysis of the post-earthquake reconstruction plans adopted after the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake in Italy. Atti della Conferenza internazionale sulla ingegneria sismica e sulla ricostruzione post sismica. Bhaktapur: ICEE-PDRP.
Mazzoleni, D., & Sepe, M. (2005). La ricostruzione post-sisma del 1980 a confronto con gli eventi del Belice, del Friuli e dell'Umbria. Il metodo di analisi e i primi risultati. In D. Mazzoleni, & M. Sepe, Rischio sismico, paesaggio, architettura. L'Irpinia, contributi per un progetto (pp. 179-186). Napoli: Amra Napoli.
Menoni, S. (2013). Valutazione di vulnerabilità sismica: dall’edificio al centro urbano e oltre. Applicazioni al caso di Salò (Brescia). Ingegneria Sismica, 1, 94-117.
Pescaroli, G., & Alexander, D. (2016). Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters. Natural Hazards, 82, 175-192. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2186-3.
Ravankhah, M., Schmidt, M., & Will, T. (2021). An indicator-based risk assessment framework for World Heritage sites in seismic zones: The case of “Bam and its Cultural Landscape” in Iran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63, 102405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102405.
Romao, X., & Bertolin, C. (2022). Risk protection for cultural heritage and historic centres: Current knowledge and further research needs. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 67, 102652. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102652.
Russo, M., Angelosanti, M., Bernardini, G., Severi, L., Quagliarini, E., & Currà, E. (2022). Factors Influencing the Intrinsic Seismic Risk of Open Spaces in Existing Built Environments: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(1), 42. doi: 10.3390/su14010042.
Santangelo, A., Melandri, E., Marzani, G., & Tondelli, S. (2022). Enhancing Resilience of Cultural Heritage in Historical Areas: A Collection of Good Practices. Sustainability, 14(9), 5171. doi:10.3390/su14095171.
Santarelli, S., Bernardini, G., & Quagliarini, E. (2018). New Indices for the Existing City-Centers Streets Network Reliability and Availability Assessment in Earthquake Emergency. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 12(2), 153-168. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2017.1328543.
Sgobbo, A. (2016). RED: hazard, vulnerability, exposure. UPLanD - Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & Environmental Design, 1(1), 5-10. doi: 10.6092/2531-9906/5029.
Singh Golla, A., Bhattacharya, S., & Gupta, S. (2020). The accessibility of urban neighbourhoods when buildings collapse due to an earthquake. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102439. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102439.
Tira, M. (1997). Pianificare la città sicura. Roma: Dedalo.
Tira, M. (2016). For a territorial organization with variable geometry. UPLanD –Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & environmental Design, 1(1), 257-272. doi: 10.6092/2531-9906/5041.
Ventura, P., Carra, M., Rossetti, S., Caselli, B., & Zazzi, M. (2020). La post-emergenza sismica nei centri storici minori. Il Piano di ricostruzione di Navelli (2011-2019). In M. Francini, A. Palermo A., & M. Viapiana, Il piano di emergenza nell’uso e nella gestione del territorio - Atti del Convegno Scientifico Società Italiana degli Urbanisti, 22-23 novembre 2019, Rende (Cs) (pp. 66-88). Milano: Franco Angeli.
Ventura, P., Zazzi, M., Carra, M., & Caselli, B. (2019). Le modalità attuative del piano di ricostruzione. In P. Ventura, A. Montepara, & M. Zazzi (Eds.), La città storica post-sisma. Memorie, piani e prassi della ricostruzione di Navelli e Civitaretenga (pp. 194-229). Parma: Grafiche Step editrice.
Zlateski, A., Lucesoli, M., Bernardini, G., & Ferreira, T. (2020). Integrating human behaviour and building vulnerability for the assessment and mitigation of seismic risk in historic centres: Proposal of a holistic human-centred simulation-based approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 43, 101392. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101392.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).