At the edge of metropolitan complexity. Designing green and blue infrastructure for the regeneration of complex metropolitan landscapes

Main Article Content

Antonio Guerra
Alessandro Sgobbo
Ferdinando Di Martino

Abstract

The aim of the research project is to devise a tool capable of helping in the decision-making phase, the technician or entity in charge, to the careful choice of where to concentrate and invest their resources. The need to think of a method with these characteristics, stems from the awareness that urban planning has to do with a huge variety of topics and knowledge related to each other, and therefore it might be advantageous to be able to rely on a tool capable of managing, monitoring and evaluating choices. The tool involves the formulation of an intervention priority matrix, calibrated with the aim of adapting the complex landscapes of Mediterranean metropolises to the effects of climate change, understood as a complex system. In fact, the matrix considers various physical and functional characteristics of a permeable open space, which in our case sees the goal of identifying those soils that, in the face of climate challenges, in their current state, generate risk and degradation. The main topic around which this research project is structured, therefore, is closely related to complexity. The study focuses on the analysis of a complex spatial system by trying to dissect the peculiarities of the relationships between the parts. Dealing with a complex system, the first step was to try to break down this main element into two macro categories: natural capital and human capital. Realizing that, while succeeding in defining the two main triggering and generating elements of a complex territorial system, the sum of its individual parts will never result in the totality of the system under consideration, it was decided to structure a method of approach and a related decision-support tool such as to encapsulate those features that, due to the critical issues faced in the territorial context of research, will be preponderant towards the expected project results

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Guerra, A., Sgobbo, A., & Di Martino, F. (2025). At the edge of metropolitan complexity. Designing green and blue infrastructure for the regeneration of complex metropolitan landscapes. UPLanD - Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & Environmental Design, 9(1), 5–26. Retrieved from https://serena.sharepress.it/index.php/upland/article/view/12505
Section
Articles

References

Acierno, A. (2018). Paesaggi inclusivi e urbanistica ecologica: infrastrutture verdi e servizi ecosistemici. TRIA - Territorio della Ricerca su Insediamenti e Ambiente. Rivista internazionale di cultura urbanistica, 11(1), 7-18.

Acierno, A. (2019). Chromatic City. Applying s-RGB Design to contemporary space. FedOA Press.

Andersson, E., Langemeyer, J., Borgström, S., McPhearson, T., Haase, D., Kronenberg, J., ... & Baró, F. (2019). Enabling green and blue infrastructure to improve contributions to human well-being and equity in urban systems. BioScience, 69(7), 566-574.

Angrilli, M. (2015). Infrastrutture verdi e blu. Urbanistica Informazioni, 263, 1-2

Autorità di Bacino Distrettuale dell’Appennino, A. D. B. D. (2021). Meridionale. Piano di Gestione delle Acque Ciclo, 2027, 2021.

Bertuglia, C., & Vaio, F. (2019). Il fenomeno urbano e la complessità. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.

D’Ambrogi, S., & Nazzini, L. (2013). Monitoraggio ISPRA 2012: la rete ecologica nella pianificazione territoriale. Reticula, 3, 1-5.

Lourenço, N. (2012). Città, violenza urbana e sentimento di insicurezza.

Maes, J., Crossman, N. D., & Burkhard, B. (2016). Mapping ecosystem services. Routledge handbook of ecosystem services, 188-204. Routledge.

Miller W., Collins W.M.G., Steiner F.R. e Cook E., (1998) An approach for greenway suitability analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning

Munafò, M., Marinosci, I., Dattola, L., Ragone, G., Carati, M., Meloni, C., ... & Benedetti, E. (2021). Consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici. In Consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici, 1-368. Report SNPA 22/21.

Musco, F., Di Venosa, M., Gissi, E., & Franz, G. (Eds.) (2015). Radici, condizioni, prospettive. Atti della XVIII Conferenza nazionale SIU, Italia ‘45-’45, Venezia 11-13 giugno 2015. Roma-Milano: Planum Publisher

Perini, K., & Sabbion, P. (2017). Urban sustainability and river restoration: green and blue infrastructure. John Wiley & Sons.

Rastelli, V., & Ciccarese, L. (2021). Nature Based Solutions s soluzioni basate sulla natura: concetto, definizioni e contesto internazionale. Reticula, 28, 13-26.

Sgobbo, A. (2018). Resilienza e rigenerazione: l’approccio water sensitive urban planning come strategia di sostenibilità urbana. BDC. Bollettino Del Centro Calza Bini, 18(1), 105-126.

Sgobbo, A. (2018). Urban Water Management 2.0: a review. UPLanD-Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & environmental Design, 3(2), 125-154.

Sgobbo, A. (2024). Sustainable Urban Communities. From “The Orto in Campania” to the LIFE SeedNEB Project–Beautifying cities through nature. TRIA - Territorio della Ricerca su Insediamenti e Ambiente. Rivista internazionale di cultura urbanistica, 17(2), 67-86.

Veerkamp, C. J., Schipper, A. M., Hedlund, K., Lazarova, T., Nordin, A., & Hanson, H. I. (2021). A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure. Ecosystem Services, 52, 101367.

Wallbaum, H., Krank, S., & Teloh, R. (2011). Prioritizing sustainability criteria in urban planning processes: Methodology application. Journal of urban planning and development, 137(1), 20-28.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.