CITISENSE. Enhancing urban well-being through smart design, data and AI in Italy's historic centres

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/11551

Keywords:

Geo-AI, Living Lab, Community engagement, Urban wellbeing, Italian historic centres

Abstract

Italian historic centres face critical challenges balancing heritage conservation with contemporary needs, particularly in regions like Calabria where smaller settlements experience depopulation, decay, and inadequate services. Traditional smart city frameworks have inadequately addressed these contexts, focusing primarily on contemporary urban environments with adaptable infrastructure. This study examines how GeoAI-enabled urban analysis and participatory design methodologies can enhance urban well-being while preserving cultural heritage in small and medium-sized historic centres. The research develops a replicable methodological framework combining advanced technologies (AI, big data, wearable devices) with Living Lab participatory processes. The approach operationalizes "urban well-being" through three measurable dimensions: physical comfort (route optimization based on weather, terrain, facilities), cultural access (personalized itineraries considering tourist density), and perceived safety (recommendations using social media sentiment, lighting data, population density). Data governance follows GDPR protocols ensuring privacy protection and algorithmic transparency through Explainable AI (XAI). Pilot sites in Calabria represent diverse typologies: peripheral centres, high-tourism destinations, isolated villages, coastal settlements, and centres near natural parks. Expected impacts span individual (enhanced comfort, safety), community (social cohesion, participation), territorial (sustainable tourism, economic vitality), and governance (data-driven resource allocation) levels. The study demonstrates that technology, integrated within strategic vision and participatory practices, can support heritage-respectful urban regeneration oriented toward collective well-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pierfrancesco Celani, University of Calabria

Architect, Ph.D. in Psychology of Programming and Artificial Intelligence. In 2006 he specialized at IUAV University of Venice in participatory planning and urban development. In 2008 he attended The Eco-Polis International Masters in environmental and regional policies for sustainability and local development at the University of Ferrara. Since his master degree, he has been working in the fields of regional planning, urban design, valorization of historical and natural cultural heritage, and environmental monitoring of large-scale infrastructure. He focused his research working on sustainable cities and architecture, investigating the relationship between design quality and sustainability. Currently, he is a research fellow at the Department of Environmental Engineering of University of Calabria and works with smart cities and innovative technologies applied to the city.

Daniel Enrique Sardo, ITESO Universidad Jesuitica de Guadalajara

Architect, Ph.D. in Economics, Territorial and Urban Development from the University of Ferrara, Italy. He is currently Coordinator of the Professional Application Programs (PAP) and Professor of the Bachelor in Architecture, Master in Sustainable City and Public Space and PhD in Habitat and Sustainability at the Department of Habitat and Urban Development of Iteso, Jesuit University of Guadalajara, Mexico. He is an ad-honorem researcher and environmental policy advisor at the Catholic University of Córdoba and a contract professor at the same university. Since 2009 he has been working as an international consultant for local governments and coordinator of numerous projects for sustainable local and urban development in Italy and Latin America. He has given conferences and seminars in Argentina, Chile and Italy on sustainable local development, interdisciplinary approach to urban and territorial problems, participatory governance, collective intelligence and smart communities. 

Massimo Zupi, University of Calabria

Associate Professor in technical and urban planning at the Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Calabria. PhD in Technologies and Environmental Planning. He conducts research on the issues of territorial governance, with particular attention to urban regeneration, reading, protection and enhancement of the landscape, local development in weak contexts, intertwining educational experiences and operational experimentation in the field, through the deepening of analysis techniques and the verification of the potential of the most innovative urban instrumentation. He was research fellow from 2012 to 2018, on the following topics: Transport and territory interaction in infomobility systems; Participation and communication in the smart city; Enhancement strategies for valuable identity landscapes; Territory Regeneration’s Tools and Techniques. 

Margherita Tufarelli, University of Florence

She is a Researcher in the design field at the University of Florence (Italy) since 2021. Her research explores the opportunities and impacts of digital transformation on the design and production processes, particularly emphasising traditional local manufacturing and its tangible and intangible Heritage. Her research interests have followed an organic path from earning a Master's Degree in Design in 2014 to a PhD in Design in 2020 at the School of Doctorate at the University of Florence. Coherent research activities enrich her profile, all rooted in the digital transition of design and manufacturing systems, always considering the centrality of intangible aspects of cultural and creative productions.   

Adriano Bisello, Jakala Civitas S.p.A

Urban Planner and Ph.D. in Real Estate Economics. He is senior researcher in the Urban and Regional Energy Systems group at Eurac Research in Bolzano (Italy) and senior Manager at Jakala Civitas. Adriano’s activities range from local to European-funded projects in the field of smart cities and energy transition, with a focus on multiple-benefits and energy communities. Actually he is project manager of the smart city project EU H2020 STARDUST in the "Lighthouse city" of Trento (Italy) , in H2020 VARCITIES, and subtask co-leader in the IEA Annex 83 on Positive Energy District.  Since 2015, Adriano has managed the international conferences on “Smart and Sustainable Planning forCities and Regions” —SSPCR— held by Eurac Research and his works are published in international books and journals. 

References

Aidaoui, A., Dechaicha, A., Alkama, D., Menai, I., & Salah Salah, H. (2024). Mapping Tomorrow’s Cities: GeoAI Strategies for Sustainable Urban Planning and Land Use Optimization. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 8 (1), 158-176. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2024.v8n1-9

Angelidou, M. (2017). Smart city planning and development shortcomings. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 10 (1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/4032

Batty, M. (2013). Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in human geography, 3 (3), 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820613513390

Batty, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence and smart cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45 (1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317751169

Bianchino, A., Carbonara, M., Madia Carucci, A. M., & Tebala D. (2022). Poverty in Italy’s inland areas. The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, 76 (4), 4-12.

Bibri, S.E. & Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 183-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016

Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C. & Nijkamp, P. (2013). Smart cities in Europe. In Creating Smarter Cities, 65-82. Routledge.

Carrosio, G. (2019). I margini al centro. L'Italia delle aree interne tra fragilità e innovazione. Roma: Donzelli Editore.

Coenen, T., Van Der Graaf, A., & Walravens, N. (2014). Firing Up the City: A Smart City Living Lab Methodology. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 4 (3), 118-128. http://www.laurea.fi/en/isj/latest_issue/Documents/ISJ_vol% 203_no%204_web_Smart%20Cities.pdf

Dembski, F., Wössner, U., Letzgus, M., Ruddat M. & Yamu, C. (2020). Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany. Sustainability, 12 (6), 2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062307

Deng, T., Zhang, K. & Shen, Z. (2021). A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6 (2), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.03.003

De Bonis, L., Concilio, G., Leanza, E., Marsh, J., & Trapani, F. (2014). Co-Creative, Re-Generative Smart Cities. Smart Cities and Planning in a Living Lab Perspective 2. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2553

De Rossi, A. (Ed.) (2018). Riabitare l'Italia. Le aree interne tra abbandoni e riconquiste. Roma: Donzelli Editore.

Dutilleul, B., Birrer, F. A. J., & Mensink, W. (2010). Unpacking European Living Labs: Analysing Innovation’s Social Dimensions. In: Müller, K., Roth, S. & Zak, M. (eds.) Social Dimension of Innovation, Prag: Linde. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2533251

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press. ISBN-10. 1250215781.

Ferramosca, G. & Terracciano, A. (2023). From Urban Vulnerabilities to Resilience: Lessons from Messina’s Integrated Risk Approach. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 7 (2), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2023.v7n2-14

Fistola, R. & La Rocca, R. A. (2024). From smart city to artificial intelligence city. Envisaging the future of urban planning. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 17 (3), 411-422. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/11081

Foth, M. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City. IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-152-0

Francini, M., Colucci, M., Palermo, A., & Viapiana, M. F. (2012). I centri storici minori: Strategie di rigenerazione funzionale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Gaglione, F. (2023). Urban planning and GeoAI in smart city policies. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 16 (3), 631-637. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10317

Gaglione, F. & Etigo, D. A. A. (2022). Accelerate urban sustainability through European action, optimization models and decision support tools for energy planning. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 15 (2), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/9240

Giuliani, F., De Paoli, R.G. & Di Miceli, E. (2021), A risk-reduction framework for urban cultural heritage: a comparative study on Italian historic centres. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 11 (4), 499-515. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2020-0099.

Gün, A. (2023). Urban Design Evolved: The Impact of Computational Tools and Data-Driven Approaches on Urban Design Practices and Civic Participation. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 7 (1), 242-260. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2023.v7n1-16

Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12 (3), 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126

Horelli, L. (ed) (2013) New Approaches to Urban Planning. Insights from Participatory Communities. Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University.

Juujärvi, S., & Pesso, K. (2013). Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland? Technology Innovation Management Review, 3 (11), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/742

Kelling, S., Hochachka, W. M., Fink, D., Riedewald, M., Caruana, R., Ballard, G., & Hooker, G. (2009). Data-intensive Science: A new paradigm for biodiversity studies. BioScience, 59 (7), 613-620. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.7.12

Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8

Kitchin, R. (2021). Data Lives: How Data Are Made and Shape Our World. Bristol University Press, ISBN 978-1529215144

Koenig, R., Miao, Y., Aichinger, A., Knecht, K., & Konieva, K. (2020). Integrating urban analysis, generative design, and evolutionary optimization for solving urban design problems. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47 (6), 997-1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319894986

Lazzeretti, L., Innocenti, N., Nannelli, M. & Oliva, S. (2023). The emergence of artificial intelligence in the regional sciences: a literature review. European Planning Studies, 31 (7), 1304-1324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2101880

Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A. G. (2012). Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2 (9), 6-11. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/602

Li, W., Batty, M. & Goodchild, M. F. (2020). Real-time GIS for smart cities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (2), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1673397

Li, W. & Hsu, C. Y. (2022). GeoAI for large-scale image analysis and machine vision: Recent progress of artificial intelligence in geography. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11 (7), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11070385

Miller, H.J. (2010). The data avalanche is here. shouldn’t we be digging?. Journal of Regional Science, 50, 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00641.x

Papa, R., Gargiulo, C., & Galderisi, A. (2013). Towards an urban planners’ perspective on Smart City. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 6 (1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/1536

Pinson, G. & Morel Journel, C. (2016). The Neoliberal City – Theory, Evidence, Debates. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4 (2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1166982

Pultrone, G. (2023). The city challenges and the new frontiers of urban planning: Digital twins as tools of urban resilience: research and practices. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 16 (1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/9392

Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2016). The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6 (1), 7-16. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/956

Söderström, O., Paasche, T. & Klauser, F. (2014). Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City, 18 (3), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.906716

Steen, K., & van Bueren, E. (2017). The defining characteristics of urban living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7 (7), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1088

Teti, V. (2017). Quel che resta. L'Italia dei paesi, tra abbandoni e ritorni. Roma: Donzelli Editore.

Teti, V. (2022). La Restanza. Torino: Einaudi.

Thakuriah, P., Tilahun, N. & Zellner, M. (2017). Big Data and Urban Informatics: Innovations and Challenges to Urban Planning and Knowledge Discovery. In Thakuriah, P., Tilahun, N. & Zellner, M. (eds). Seeing Cities Through Big Data, 11-45, Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40902-3.

Thomas, M. R. (2002). A GIS-based decision support system for brownfield redevelopment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58 (1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00229-8.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1355

Veeckman, C., & van der Graaf, S. (2015). The City as Living Laboratory: Empowering Citizens with the Citadel Toolkit. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5 (3), 6-17. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/877

Viesti, G. (2021). Centri e periferie. Europa, Italia, Mezzogiorno dal XX al XXI secolo. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S.D., Tegmark, M. & Fuso Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications 11(233). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J. & Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda, Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053

Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. (2011). Managing the Challenges of Becoming an Open Innovation Company: Experiences from Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1), 19-25. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/489

Xu, H., Omitaomu, F., Sabri, S. & Zlatanova, S. (2024). Leveraging generative AI for urban digital twins: a scoping review on the autonomous generation of urban data, scenarios, designs, and 3D city models for smart city advancement. Urban Informatics, 3(29). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44212-024-00060-w

Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Buys, L., Ioppolo, G., Sabatini-Marques, J., Moreira da Costa, E. & Yun, J.J. (2018). Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, 81, 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-61039-569-4

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

Celani, P., Sardo, D. E., Zupi, M., Tufarelli, M., & Bisello, A. (2026). CITISENSE. Enhancing urban well-being through smart design, data and AI in Italy’s historic centres . TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 19(1), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/11551

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.