Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans and active mobility. An assessment through the lens of justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/13321

Keywords:

Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs), Active mobility, JUST STREETS, Mobility justice

Abstract

Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) are strategic spatial planning tools to address urban mobility needs. The European Commission encourages member states to develop SUMPs to improve quality of life through collaboration with authorities at multiple levels. SUMPs aim to make non-motorised transport safe and accessible, encouraging a shift toward sustainable and active mobility. Within this context, a justice framework offers a valuable lens to assess how fairly resources for active mobility are distributed and accessed. Although active mobility is often linked to mobility justice, the integration of justice dimensions, e.g. distributional, procedural, recognitional, and restorative, is not always ensured in SUMPs. This paper examines how SUMPs address active mobility through the lens of justice, focusing on distributional and procedural justice, in eight European JUST STREETS pilot cities. It assesses to what extent SUMPs prioritise walking and cycling and how street space allocation and participatory processes reflect fairness and inclusivity. The analysis highlights the potential and limitations of SUMPs in advancing mobility justice, identifies gaps in how justice dimensions in walking and cycling are incorporated. It also provides practical recommendations to enhance active mobility strategies. These insights support cities in developing their SUMPs towards more equitable and climate neutral mobility systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aida Shaneh, Interuniversity Department of Urban and Regional Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino

Ph.D. researcher at Politecnico di Torino (Italy), specialising in urban mobility, spatial planning, territorial governance strategies. Her doctoral research focuses on active mobility for teenagers from a justice perspective. Through an interdisciplinary approach, she seeks to bridge policy, planning, and practice to foster safer and more inclusive urban mobility solutions.

Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone, Interuniversity Department of Urban and Regional Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino

Associate Professor in Spatial Planning at the Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino. Her research focuses on mobility, land use-transport interaction and accessibility, with various approaches, at different scales, in urban and rural contexts.

Francesca Blanc, LINKS FOUNDATION

Ph.D. in Urban & Regional Development, Senior Researcher at the LINKS Foundation. Her research focuses on spatial governance and policy transfer in Europe and beyond, with a strong focus on Latin American planning systems.

Giulia Melis, LINKS FOUNDATION

Program Manager of City, Climate & Environment at the LINKS Foundation, Future Cities & Communities research domain. JUST STREETS project's coordinator, her research focuses on walkability, health impacts of urban transformations and climate adaptation/mitigation strategies. 

References

Adey, P., Bissell, D., Hannam, K., Merriman, P. & Sheller, M. (2014). The Handbook of Mobilities. London: Routledge.

Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport policy, 15 (2), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tranpol.2007.10.005

Cook, S., Stevenson, L., Aldred, R., Kendall, M. & Cohen, T. (2022). More than walking and cycling: What is ‘active travel’?. Transport Policy, 126, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.015

D’Amico, A. (2024). Strategies and instruments for active mobility: European overview. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 17 (2), 363-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10940

D’Arcus, B. (2006). Boundaries of Dissent: Protest and State Power in the Media Age. New York: Routledge.

Dalkmann, H. & Brannigan, C. (2007). Transport and climate change. Module 5e: Sustainable Transport: A Sourcebook for Policy-Makers in Developing Cities. Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Eschborn.

EEA (2024). Delivering justice in sustainability transitions. https://doi.org/10.2800/228718

Eltis (2019). Guidelines for developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. Retrieved from: https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/sump_guidelines_2019_interactive_document_1.pdf.

EU COMM. (2020a). Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/urban/urban_mobility_en.

EU COMM. (2020b). Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/sustainable_en.

European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (2019). Guidelines for developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan second edition: https://urban-mobility-observatory.transport.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-09/sump_guidelines_2019_second%20edition.pdf

Gössling, S. (2016). Urban transport justice. Journal of transport Geography, 54, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jtrangeo.2016.05.002

Harada, T. (2023). Mobility justice and sustainable futures. Australian Geographer, 54 (4), 425-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00049182.2023.2271615

Hartman, L. M. & Prytherch, D. (2015). Streets to live in: Justice, Space, and sharing the road. Environmental Ethics, 37 (1), 21-44.

Jordová, R. & Brůhová-Foltýnová, H. (2021). Rise of a new sustainable urban mobility planning paradigm in local governance: Does the SUMP make a difference? Sustainability, 13 (11), 5950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115950

Kaufmann, V. (2017). Re-thinking mobility: Contemporary sociology. Routledge.

Klímová, A. & Pinho, P. (2020). National policies and municipal practices: A comparative study of Czech and Portuguese urban mobility plans. Case studies on transport policy, 8 (4), 1247-1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.08.005

Lefebvre, H., Kofman, E. & Lebas, E. (1996). Writings on cities. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Martens, K. (2016). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. New York; London: Routledge.

Massey, D. (1991). A Global Sense Of Place. Marxism Today, 38, 24-29.

Munkácsy, A., Földes, D., Miskolczi, M. & Jászberényi, M. (2024). Urban mobility in the future: text analysis of mobility plans. European Transport Research Review, 16 (1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-024-00649-x

Pereira, R. H., Schwanen, T. & Banister, D. (2017). Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transport reviews, 37 (2), 170-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660

Prytherch, D. (2018). Rethinking the Street as Space of Mobility, Rights, and (In) Justice. In Law, Engineering, and the American Right-of-Way: Imagining a More Just Street, 13-32, Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Rainieri, G., Carra, M., Richiedei, A. & Pezzagno, M. (2024). Evaluating active mobility: enhancing the framework for social sustainability. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 3, 113-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10912

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Rietveld, P. (2001). Biking and walking: the position of non-motorized transport modes in transport systems. In K. J. Button & D. A. Hensher (Eds.). Handbook of transport systems and traffic control, 299-319. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Rodier, C., Shaheen, S.A. & Chung, S. (2003). Unsafe at any speed? What the Literature Says about Low-Speed Modes. University of California, Davis: Institute of Transportation Studies. https://trid.trb.org/view/1100302.

Schwanen, T. (2021). Achieving just transitions to low-carbon urban mobility. Nature Energy, 6 (7), 685-687. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-021-00856-z

Sheller, M. (2018). Theorising mobility justice. Tempo social, 30 (2), 17-34.

Sheller, M. (2020). Mobility justice. In M. Büscher, M. Freudendal-Pedersen, S. Kesselring & N. Grauslund Kristensen (Eds.). Handbook of research methods and applications for mobilities, 11-20, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Sheller, M. & Urry, J. (2000). The city and the car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 737-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00276

Spadaro, I., Rotelli, C., & Adinolfi, P. (2023). Sustainable mobility for urban regeneration: NRRP, sustainability certifications in Albisola. TeMA-Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 16(2), 255-277.

Steg, L. & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of environmental psychology, 29 (3), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

Torrisi, V., Garau, C., Ignaccolo, M. & Inturri, G. (2020). Sustainable urban mobility plans: key concepts and a critical revision on SUMPs guidelines. In International conference on computational science and its applications, 613-628. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Van Wee, B. (2007). Rail infrastructure: Challenges for cost–benefit analysis and other ex ante evaluations. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30 (1), 31-48.

Verlinghieri, E. & Schwanen, T. (2020). Transport and mobility justice: Evolving discussions. Journal of Transport Geography, 87, 102798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102798

Wachs, M. & Kumagai, T. G. (1973). Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 7 (5), 437-456.

Wågsæther, K., Remme, D., Haarstad, H. & Sareen, S. (2022). The justice pitfalls of a sustainable transport transition. Environment and Planning F, 1 (2-4), 187-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26349825221082169

Downloads

Published

30-03-2026

How to Cite

Shaneh, A., Vitale Brovarone, E., Blanc, F., & Melis, G. (2026). Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans and active mobility. An assessment through the lens of justice. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, (1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/13321

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.