Self-knowledge, Authenticity and Obedience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6093/1593-7178/2836Keywords:
Self-knowledge, Authenticity, Obedience, Williams, WeilAbstract
In this paper I propose a certain account of how the epistemic privilege of the first-person perspective relates to a certain kind of authority upon oneself. I will challenge Robert Dunn’s and Richard Moran’s view on this subject matter, and sketch an alternative approach. For this purpose, I will firstly take advantage of Bernard Williams’ notions of acknowledgement and making sense and, secondly, I will make use of Simone Weil’s distinction between the two senses of obedience and the associated notion of attention. In contrast with Moran’s and Dunn’s view, I will conclude that a certain sort of self-perception lies at the heart of our agency and, therefore, in our capacity to lead a relatively authentic life. I will argue that this kind of self-perception escapes the standard worries about a private mind but is still specifically first-personal.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author retains the copyright of his work whilst granting anyone the possibility “to reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate, publicly exhibit, display, perform and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are cited correctly. When submitting the text for publication the author is furthermore required to declare that the contents and the structure of the work are original and that it does not by any means compromise the rights of third parties nor the obligations connected to the safeguard of the moral and economic rights of other authors or other right holders, both for texts, images, photographs, tables, as well as for other parts which compose the contribution. The author furthermore declares that he/she is conscious of the sanctions prescribed by the penal code and by the Italian Criminal and Special Laws for false documents and the use false documents, and that therefore Bollettino Filosofico is not liable to responsibilities of any nature, civil, administrative or penal, and that the author agrees to indemnify and hold Bollettino Filosofico harmless from all requests and claims by third parties.