Interpreting Memory, Forgetfulness and Testimony in Theory of Recollection

Authors

  • Ni Yu University of Edinburgh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6093/1593-7178/4054

Keywords:

Recollection, Method of Hypothesis, Testimony, Knowledge, Understanding

Abstract

The essay is a new attempt to interpret theory of recollection in the context of “the pietas of thinking”. It will explore the different stages of theory of recollection in the Meno with a focus on making enquiry of the conception of episteme. The key conception of episteme is significant in new interpretation of theory of recollection. Its relationship of knowledge and understanding is also decided in the discussion. The essay argues that theory of recollection can be divided into elements of memory, forgetfulness and testimony. Moreover, this division is in accordance with the known elements of mythical story, slave boy demonstration, method of hypothesis in theory of recollection. By making this comparison the value and reason of theory of recollection will be warranted and rediscovered in the new era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-28

How to Cite

Yu, N. (2016). Interpreting Memory, Forgetfulness and Testimony in Theory of Recollection. Bollettino Filosofico, 31, 282–300. https://doi.org/10.6093/1593-7178/4054

Issue

Vol. 31 (2016): The piety of thought. Memory, testimony, forgetfulness

Section

Focus

License

The author retains the copyright of his work whilst granting anyone the possibility “to reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate, publicly exhibit, display, perform and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are cited correctly. When submitting the text for publication the author is furthermore required to declare that the contents and the structure of the work are original and that it does not by any means compromise the rights of third parties nor the obligations connected to the safeguard of the moral and economic rights of other authors or other right holders, both for texts, images, photographs, tables, as well as for other parts which compose the contribution. The author furthermore declares that he/she is conscious of the  sanctions prescribed by the penal code and by the Italian Criminal and Special Laws for false documents and the use false documents, and that therefore Bollettino Filosofico is not liable to responsibilities of any nature, civil, administrative or penal, and that the author agrees to indemnify and hold Bollettino Filosofico harmless from all requests and claims by third parties.