Responding to the Other: Autonomy and Heteronomy between Levinas and Waldenfels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6093/1593-7178/6502Abstract
The article aims to discuss the issue of responsibility towards the other taking into account the criticisms that Bernhard Waldenfels addresses to the Levinasian philosophy. In Otherwise than Being Levinas argues that subjectivity is characterized by passivity, insofar as it is constitutively “exposed” to the other, in such a way that it cannot escape responsibility. Waldenfels criticizes this Levinasian conception, arguing that the “trauma” which according to Levinas affects the subject leaves no room for the possibility of choosing the response. In this regard, I show that even Levinas’s view admits the possibility of giving different responses, since the subject is never in a “dual” relationship, but there is always also the “third”, which requires comparison. As a consequence, heteronomy does not in any way cancel the principle of autonomy.
Keywords: Responsibility, Autonomy, Heteronomy, Levinas, Waldenfels
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author retains the copyright of his work whilst granting anyone the possibility “to reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate, publicly exhibit, display, perform and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are cited correctly. When submitting the text for publication the author is furthermore required to declare that the contents and the structure of the work are original and that it does not by any means compromise the rights of third parties nor the obligations connected to the safeguard of the moral and economic rights of other authors or other right holders, both for texts, images, photographs, tables, as well as for other parts which compose the contribution. The author furthermore declares that he/she is conscious of the sanctions prescribed by the penal code and by the Italian Criminal and Special Laws for false documents and the use false documents, and that therefore Bollettino Filosofico is not liable to responsibilities of any nature, civil, administrative or penal, and that the author agrees to indemnify and hold Bollettino Filosofico harmless from all requests and claims by third parties.
