Movement and Pulsion. Notes on Bernet reader of Heidegger reader of Aristotle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6093/1593-7178/7433Abstract
In this paper, I would like to elaborate on the part of Heidegger’s hermeneutics of facticity that is devoted to the works of Aristotle, especially his Physics. More specifically, my aim is to shed light upon an “hermeneutic” reading of this part of the hermeneutics of facticity by showing how the great Husserl scholar Rudolf Bernet, in an important monograph published in 2013, draws upon Heidegger’s reading of Aristotle in order to address issues seemingly of his own. I will discuss the questions raised by the articulation of drive (“pulsion”) and movement in Bernet’s study out of a phenomenological interpretation of Aristotle’s kinesis as developed by Heidegger in the early 1920’s and beyond. I will further lay out some new questions regarding the historical as well as systematic relationships between Heidegger’s et Bernet’s respective projects.
Keywords: Aristotle, Bernet, Drive, Facticity, Hermeneutics, Movement
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author retains the copyright of his work whilst granting anyone the possibility “to reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate, publicly exhibit, display, perform and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are cited correctly. When submitting the text for publication the author is furthermore required to declare that the contents and the structure of the work are original and that it does not by any means compromise the rights of third parties nor the obligations connected to the safeguard of the moral and economic rights of other authors or other right holders, both for texts, images, photographs, tables, as well as for other parts which compose the contribution. The author furthermore declares that he/she is conscious of the sanctions prescribed by the penal code and by the Italian Criminal and Special Laws for false documents and the use false documents, and that therefore Bollettino Filosofico is not liable to responsibilities of any nature, civil, administrative or penal, and that the author agrees to indemnify and hold Bollettino Filosofico harmless from all requests and claims by third parties.