Requirement of Distinction and Need for Proximity. The Husserlian Conception of Empathy as the Basis of Transcendental Intersubjectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6093/1593-7178/9665Abstract
In this essay my aim is to defend the Husserlian account of empathy. The problerm of the other is the touchstone of transcendental phenomenology and I shall argue that the account Husserl provides in the fifth chapter of Cartesian Meditations is both schematically sound and methodological fruitful. The philosophic problem of other is particularly acute for Husserl because the aim of his inquiry requires its solution yet the procedure he employs appears to preclude. By analyzing the evolution of the entire Husserlian problem of empathy and, in parallel, the extension of the reduction to intersubjectivity, it was intended to show that whatever the content of empathy, Husserl has reached his philosophical goal: to disclose its foundation and to articulate its invariant eidetic structure.
Keywords: Analogical Apperception, Appresentation, Empathy, Husserl, Phenomenology
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author retains the copyright of his work whilst granting anyone the possibility “to reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate, publicly exhibit, display, perform and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are cited correctly. When submitting the text for publication the author is furthermore required to declare that the contents and the structure of the work are original and that it does not by any means compromise the rights of third parties nor the obligations connected to the safeguard of the moral and economic rights of other authors or other right holders, both for texts, images, photographs, tables, as well as for other parts which compose the contribution. The author furthermore declares that he/she is conscious of the sanctions prescribed by the penal code and by the Italian Criminal and Special Laws for false documents and the use false documents, and that therefore Bollettino Filosofico is not liable to responsibilities of any nature, civil, administrative or penal, and that the author agrees to indemnify and hold Bollettino Filosofico harmless from all requests and claims by third parties.
