The creative co-design of collective spaces. Two case studies of generating new Spatial and Social Infrastructures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/11102Keywords:
Co-design, Collective spaces, Community Engagement, Urban Regeneration, Cityforming ProtocolAbstract
In recent decades, the education of minors has been compromised by high rates of educational poverty, further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This situation reduces the effectiveness of social infrastructure – the fourth pillar of infrastructure alongside green, blue, and grey infrastructures – that underpins the welfare of national and local entities and encompasses the spaces and artifacts that host social, cultural, and economic activities. The “P.arch. Playground per architetti di comunità” project (P.arch. Playground for Community Architects), aimed at addressing educational poverty, has piloted an innovative educational pathway based on creative activities and engagement with territories and communities from an inclusive and regenerative perspective. The P.arch project involved schools in socio-economically fragile contexts in Sicily and Lazio regions, developing four modules, including “Creative Architecture,” which enabled students to design public and school spaces. Through these activities, new shared spaces and Community Hubs were created to promote social inclusion and community education. Students acquired both cognitive and non-cognitive skills, contributing to an innovative model of community development. This contribution, therefore, highlights the importance of educational processes for generating new connections within the social infrastructure system. It aims to demonstrate how active education and youth engagement are essential for addressing educational poverty and fostering social well-being.
Downloads
References
Ashwort, G. J. (2008). No Paradigms and paradoxes in planning the past. In M. Smith & L. Onderwater (Eds.), Selling or Telling? Paradoxes in tourism, culture and heritage (pp. 23–24). ATLAS Contact.
Bazzu, P. & Talu, V. (2016). Tactical Urbanism Italia.
Bianchi, F. & Moscarelli, R. (2024). Redesigning “school squares” for a public city. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, (3), 129-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10913
Boglietti, S., Nota, M. & Tiboni, M. (2024). The exploration of tactical urbanism as a strategy for adapting to climate change. The “SpaziAttivi” program in the city of Brescia. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, (3), 169-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10920
Carta, M. (1999). L’armatura culturale del territorio: il patrimonio culturale come matrice di identità e strumento di sviluppo. Franco Angeli.
Carta, M. (2015). Iper-strategie del riciclo: Cityforming © Protocol. In M. Carta & B. Lino (Eds.), Urban Hyper-Metabolism. Aracne Internazionale.
Carta, M. (2017). The Augmented City. A Paradigm Shift. List Lab.
Carta, M. (2021). Città aumentate. Dieci gesti-barriera per il futuro. Il Margine.
Carta, M. (2022). Homo urbanus. Donzelli Editore.
Carta, M. (2024). Romanzo urbanistico: Storie dalle città del mondo. Sellerio Editore.
Carta, M. & Ronsivalle, D. (2020). Neoanthropocene Raising and Protection of Natural and Cultural Heritage: A Case Study in Southern Italy. Sustainability, 12 (4186), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104186
Casanova, H. & Hernandez, J. (2014). Public Space Acupuncture: Strategies and Interventions for Activating City Life. Actar Publishers. Retrieved from: https://books.google.it/books?id=C_WRngEACAAJ
Colantonio, A. (2011). Social Sustainability: Exploring the Linkages Between Research, Policy and Practice. In European Research on Sustainable Development; Jaeger, C., Tàbara, J., Jaeger, J., Eds. Springer.
Crutzen, P. J. & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. IGBP [International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme] Newsletter, 41 (17). Retrieved from: http://www.igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/1376383088452/NL41.pdf
D’Amico, A. (2024). Examples of good experiences for child-friendly cities. Comparison of sustainable practices in Italy and around the world. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment , (2), 143-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10886
Esopi, G. (2018). Urban commons: social resilience experiences to increase the quality of urban system. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 11 (2 SE-Focus). https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5532
Fabrizio, C. (1995). The Cultural dimension of development: towards a practical approach. UNESCO. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/notice?id=p::usmarcdef_0000099686
Fischer, F. & Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Francesco, P. (2020). Laudato Si’: Enciclica sulla cura della casa comune. PIEMME. Retrieved from: https://books.google.it/books?id=63kBEAAAQBAJ
Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L. & Knuiman, M. (2012). Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32 (4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2012.07.002
Gibbons, S. & Silva, O. (2008). Urban density and pupil attainment. Journal of Urban Economics, 63 (2), 631–650.
Gisotti, M. R. & Masiani, B. (2024). Promoting a local and just green deal. School open spaces as a strategic opportunity for the city in the ecological transition. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, (1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10298
Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations. Environment and Planning B, 23, 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1068/b230217
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan
ISTAT (2023). Condizioni di vita dei minori. Anno 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.istat.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Deprivazione_minori_6_12.pdf
Lydon, M. & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical Urbanism: Short-term Action for Long-term Change. Island Press.
Manzini, E. & Rizzo, F. (2011). Small projects/large changes: Participatory design as an open participated process. CoDesign, 7 (3–4), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630472
Mela, A. & Toldo, A. (2019). Socio-Spatial Inequalities in Contemporary Cities. Springer.
Miles, N., Cleveland, B., Chandler, P. (2023). School and Community Infrastructure Networks: What Might These Look Like?. In: Cleveland, B., Backhouse, S., Chandler, P., McShane, I., Clinton, J.M., Newton, C. (eds) Schools as Community Hubs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9972-7_7
Mostafavi, M. & Doherty, G. (2016). Ecological Urbanism. Harvard University, Graduate School of Design.
Pörtner, H., Roberts, D., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., Craig, M., Langsdorf, S., Löschke, S., Möller, V., Okem, A., Rama, B., Adams, H., Adelekan, I., Adler, C., Adrian, R., Aldunce, P., Ali, E., Ara Begum, R., … Sukumar, R. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report Citations to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [ to the Sixth Assessment Report of the . https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.Front
Pultrone, G. (2014). Participation and Governance for More Human Smart Cities. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 7(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2558
Ralls, D. (2019). Becoming cooperative—Challenges and insights: Repositioning school behavior as a collective endeavour. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23 (11), 1134–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1629159
Sanders, E. B.-N. & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4 (1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Save the Children (2014). La Lampada di Aladino.
Save the Children (2019). Il tempo dei bambini. Atlante dell’Infanzia a rischio 2019.
Save the Children (2022). No Povertà educativa: necessario un cambio di passo nelle politiche di contrasto.
Scheiber, S. & Mifsud, W. J. (2024). Developing processes for the co-creation and co-governance of urban green space in dense urban areas: a Maltese case study. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, (2), 65-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/10273
Schulz, K. P., Geithner, S., Woelfel, C. & Krzywinski, J. (2015). Toolkit-based modelling and serious play as means to foster creativity in innovation processes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24 (2), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12113
Shannon, K. & Smets, M. (2016). The Landscape of Contemporary Infrastructure. Nai010 Publishers.
UNESCO (2015). Rethinking Education: Towards a Global Common Good? UNESCO.
UNESCO (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972). Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/legal/agreements/unesco/1972/en/35057
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Annalisa Contato, Daniele Ronsivalle

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
