Aging population and the accessibility of public transportation services: policy perspective for Turkey

Authors

  • Süleyman Nurullah Adahi Sahin Civil Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9232-8104
  • Abdulkadir Özden Civil Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3657-890X
  • Ardeshi Faghri Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware
  • Michael L. Vaughan Office of the Interim Vice Provost for Diversity & Inclusion, University of Delaware

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/11155

Keywords:

Accessibility, Urban mobility, Elderly people, Public transportation accessibility, Societal aging

Abstract

Projections indicate that elderly individuals will constitute approximately 25% of the total population within the next 30 years. As aging and mobility-challenged populations require targeted planning, policies and physical infrastructure related to public transportation must be reassessed with greater precision and inclusivity. This study offers a comprehensive evaluation of Turkey’s national public transportation accessibility policies and explores their potential relevance for other countries. Additionally, interviews with four leading NGOs in Turkey were conducted to identify practical challenges faced by the elderly in urban transport systems. Thematic analysis of the feedback revealed critical deficiencies in vehicle design, fare policy, pedestrian infrastructure, traveler information systems, and driver behavior. Based on this multi-source analysis, the study proposes actionable policy recommendations to improve the accessibility, safety, and usability of public transportation services for elderly populations. The findings underscore the need for standardized design, stronger policy enforcement, and more inclusive digital and physical mobility solutions to ensure active aging and social participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Süleyman Nurullah Adahi Sahin, Civil Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya

He is a civil engineer with a Ph.D. in Transportation. He has a strong research background in sustainable mobility and public transportation systems. His academic interests include mobility justice, transport policy evaluation, and age-friendly infrastructure planning. He is currently a researcher at Sakarya University of Applied Sciences.

Abdulkadir Özden, Civil Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya

He is a civil engineer with a Ph.D. in Transportation from the University of Delaware. He is currently an Assistant Professor at Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, where he focuses on sustainable transportation systems, accessibility, and infrastructure planning. His research interests include traffic safety analysis, inclusive mobility, and public transport operations. He also contributes to interdisciplinary studies related to urban resilience and social policy.

Ardeshi Faghri, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware

He is a civil engineer with a Ph.D. in Transportation from the University of Virginia. He is a professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Delaware. His areas of expertise include travel behavior modeling, intelligent transportation systems, and infrastructure design. He has led numerous research projects funded by federal and state agencies in the United States.

Michael L. Vaughan, Office of the Interim Vice Provost for Diversity & Inclusion, University of Delaware

He is a scholar in diversity and inclusion policy with a strong interdisciplinary focus. He holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in electrical engineering from North Carolina A&T State University, and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Delaware. His work integrates institutional equity, inclusive education, and urban planning strategies.

References

Ashford, N. & Bell, W. G. (1979). Transport for the elderly and the handicapped—an overview from the late 70’s. Transportation Planning and Technology, 5 (2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081067908717149

Ahsan, M., Shakeel, N., & Baig, F. (2023). Public perceptions of barriers to walk in urban areas of Lahore, Pakistan. TeMA – Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 16(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/9353

Aguiar, B. & Macário, R. (2017). The need for an Elderly centred mobility policy. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4355–4369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.309

Atkins, W.S. (2001). Older People: Their Transport Needs and Requirement. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.

Bozdağ, A., Gümüş, M., Gümüş, K., & Durduran, S. (2017). Accessibility analysis for the elderly in an urban area from turkey. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, (Special Issue), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.si2017.2

Banister, D. (2005). Unsustainable Transport: city transport in the new century, 0 Ed., Routledge.

Banister, D. & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension. Transport Policy, 11 (2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-070x(03)00052-0

Bocca, A. (2024). Sustainable development and proximity city: The environmental role of new public spaces. TeMA – Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 1(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/10414

Browning, C. & Thomas, S. (2013). Enhancing quality of life in older people. https://psychology.org.au/publications/inpsych/2013/february/browning.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cohen, S. A. & Gössling, S. (2015). A darker side of hypermobility. Environment and Planning a Economy and Space, 47 (8), 166–1679. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x15597124

Corazza, M.V., Musso, A., & Karlsson, M.A. (2017). “More accessible bus stops: Results from the 3iBS research project.” Transport Infrastructure and Systems, CRC Press.

Council of the European Union (2008). Council Decision 2008/164/EC of 21 January 2008 setting up the Erasmus Mundus external cooperation window programme. Official Journal of the European Union, L 56, 1–2. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2008/164/oj/eng

Dickerson, A. E., Molnar, L. J., Eby, D. W., Adler, G., Bédard, M., Berg-Weger, M., Classen, S., Foley, D., Horowitz, A., Kerschner, H., Page, O., Silverstein, N. M., Staplin, L., & Trujillo, L. (2007). Transportation and Aging: A research agenda for Advancing Safe Mobility. The Gerontologist, 47 (5), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/47.5.578

Davey, J. A. (2006). Older people and transport: coping without a car. Ageing and Society, 27 (1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x06005332

Engwicht, D. (1993). Reclaiming our cities and towns : better living with less traffic, Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.

European Parliament & Council of the European Union (2014). Regulation (EU) No 1300/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2013 on the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006. Official Journal of the European Union, L 347, 281–288. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/1300/oj/eng

Fatima, K. & Moridpour, S. (2019). Measuring public transport accessibility for elderly. MATEC Web of Conferences, 259, 03006. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925903006

Gargiulo, C., Zucaro, F., & Gaglione, F. (2018). A Set of Variables for the Elderly Accessibility in Urban Areas. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 53-66 Pages. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5738

Goodwin, P., & Lyons, G. (2010). Public attitudes to transport: Interpreting the evidence. Transportation Planning and Technology, 33 (1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060903429264

Grava, S. (2003). Urban transportation systems: Choices for communities. New York, McGraw-Hill.

Hounsell, N., Shrestha, B., McDonald, M., & Wong, A. (2016). Open data and the needs of older people for public transport information. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 4334–4343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.355

Kara, C., Özden, A., Altın Yavuz, A., & Bilgiç, Ş. (2025). Modeling and variable selection of healthcare trip behaviours using statistical learning techniques. Transport Policy, 170, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.05.008

Kara, Ç., & Bilgiç, Ş. (2021). Estimation of hospital trip characteristics in terms of transportation planning. Journal of Transport & Health, 20, 100987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100987

Kim, S. & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2004). Travel Mode Choice of the Elderly: Effects of Personal, Household, Neighborhood, and Trip Characteristics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1894 (1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3141/1894-13

Levin, L. (2019). How May Public Transport Influence the Practice of Everyday Life among Younger and Older People and How May Their Practices Influence Public Transport? Social Sciences, 8 (3), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8030096

Lin, D. & Cui, J. (2021). Transport and mobility needs for an ageing society from a policy perspective: review and implications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (22), 11802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211802

Lynch, K. (1984). A Theory of Good City Form. MIT Press.

Mackett, R. (2015). Improving accessibility for older people – Investing in a valuable asset. Journal of Transport & Health, 2 (1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2014.10.004

Metz, D. (2017). Future Transport Technologies for an Ageing Society: Practice and Policy. In C. Musselwhite (Ed.), Transport and Sustainability (Vol. 10, pp. 207–220). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-994120170000010009

Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure (2020). National ITS Strategy Document and 2020–2023 Action Plan. https://www.uab.gov.tr/uploads/pages/akilli-ulasim-sistemleri/ulusal-akilli-ulasim-sistemleri-strateji-belgesi-ve-eylem-plani.pdf

National Occupational Standard (2013). 13UMS0378-3 Rev.00: Urban public transport bus driver national occupational standard. https://www.myk.gov.tr

OECD (2015). Ageing in Cities. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264231160-en

Official Gazette (2005). Law on the Disabled (Law No: 5378). Sayı: 25868. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2005/07/20050707.htm

Official Gazette (2014a). Disabled Persons Regulation.

Official Gazette (2014b). Free or Discounted Travel Cards Regulation.

Public Buses Operation Instructions (2009). https://tuhim.ibb.gov.tr/media/2248/oezel-halk-otobuesue-yoenergesi.pdf

Rainieri, G., Carra, M., Richiedei, A. & Pezzagno, M. (2024). Evaluating active mobility: enhancing the framework for social sustainability. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, (3), 113-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10912

Ranković Plazinić, B., & Jović, J. (2018). Mobility and transport potential of elderly in differently accessible rural areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 68, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.03.016

Rosenbloom, S., & Morris, J. (1998). Travel Patterns of Older Australians in an International Context: Policy Implications and Options. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1617 (1), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.3141/1617-26

Saif, M. A., Zefreh, M. M., & Torok, A. (2019). Public Transport Accessibility: A Literature Review. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 47 (1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.12072

Schwanen, T., Banister, D., & Bowling, A. (2012). Independence and mobility in later life. Geoforum, 43 (6), 1313–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.04.001

Schwanen, T. & Ziegler, F. (2011). Wellbeing, independence and mobility: An introduction. Ageing & Society, 31 (5). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001467

Shi, Z., Pun-Cheng, L. S. C., Liu, X., Lai, J., Tong, C., Zhang, A., Zhang, M., & Shi, W. (2020). Analysis of the Temporal Characteristics of the Elderly Traveling by Bus Using Smart Card Data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(12), 751. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9120751

Shrestha, B. P., Millonig, A., Hounsell, N. B., & McDonald, M. (2017). Review of Public Transport Needs of Older People in European Context. Journal of Population Ageing, 10 (4), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-016-9168-9

Sinha, K. C. & Labi, S. (2011). Transportation Decision Making: Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming. Wiley and Sons.

Somenahalli, S., Hayashi, Y., Taylor, M., Akiyama, T., Adair, T., & Sawada, D. (2016). Accessible transportation and mobility issues of elderly—How does Australia compare with Japan? Journal of Sustainable Urbanization, Planning and Progress, 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.18063/JSUPP.2016.01.001

Sönmez, V. & Alacapınar, F. G. (2013). Örneklendirilmiş Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Arı Yayıncılık.

Svärd, M. (2017). Designing city buses with the elderly user in mind [Master of Science, KTH]. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1139946/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Szeto, W., Yang, L., Wong, R., Li, Y., & Wong, S. (2017). Spatio-temporal travel characteristics of the elderly in an ageing society. Travel Behaviour and Society, 9, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.07.005

Turkish Standards Institution (2017). TS 12576: Rules for the planning and design of urban roads. Ankara: TSE Publications.

Türken, A. Ö., & Conticelli, E. (2024). Role of new technologies on pedestrian walking behaviour research. TeMA – Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, TeMA Special Issue 3, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10929

Vuchic, V. E. (2017). Urban Transit: Operations, Planning, and Economics (1st ed.). Wiley and Sons.

Whelan, M., Langford, J., Oxley, J., Koppel, S., & Charlton, J. (2006). The elderly and mobility: A review of the literature (Report No. 255). Monash University Accident Research Centre. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265047315

Wang, Y., Monzon, A., & Ciommo, F. D. (2015). Assessing the accessibility impact of transport policy by a land-use and transport interaction model – The case of Madrid. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.03.005

Wong, R. C. P., Szeto, W. Y., Yang, L., Li, Y. C., & Wong, S. C. (2017). Elderly users’ level of satisfaction with public transport services in a high-density and transit-oriented city. Journal of Transport & Health, 7, 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.10.004

Wong, R. C. P., Szeto, W. Y., Yang, L., Li, Y. C., & Wong, S. C. (2018). Public transport policy measures for improving elderly mobility. Transport Policy, 63, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.015

World Bank (2023). Population ages 65 and above (% of total population) [Data set]. Retrieved May 21, 2025, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS

World Health Organization (2011). Global Health and Aging. https://www.nia.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2017-06/global_health_aging.pdf

Zając, A. P. (2016). City Accessible for Everyone – Improving Accessibility of Public Transport Using the Universal Design Concept. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 1270–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.199

Downloads

Published

31-08-2025

How to Cite

Sahin, S. N. A., Özden, A., Faghri, A., & Vaughan, M. L. (2025). Aging population and the accessibility of public transportation services: policy perspective for Turkey. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 18(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/11155

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.