GIS-based bikeability approach as a tool in determining urban bicycle infrastructure capacity for Eskisehir, Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/12336Keywords:
bikeability, bicycle infastructure, gis, urban mobility, sustainable transportationAbstract
Urban transportation systems are rapidly evolving to meet contemporary challenges such as traffic congestion, environmental concerns, and sustainable mobility demands. Cycling is increasingly recognized as a viable mode of sustainable urban transportation due to its environmental, economic, and health benefits. However, determining the adequacy and capacity of bicycle infrastructure remains a key challenge for urban planners. This study assesses the bicycle accessibility of Eskişehir, Turkey, by analyzing both existing and planned bicycle infrastructure using GIS-based methods. The research employs three established methodologies: Bicycle Stress Level (BSL), Bicycle Suitability Score (BSS), and Bicycle Level of Service (BLOS) to evaluate the urban road network and bicycle paths. These methods consider various factors including traffic conditions, road geometry, and infrastructure quality. The results reveal a disparity: while the BSS indicates that a large portion of the road network is "Suitable" or "Highly Suitable" for cycling, the BSL identifies significant "High Stress" areas for cyclists. Similarly, BLOS analysis shows that most of the network functions at "Level B," suggesting a reasonable environment for cycling, yet this contrasts with the high stress levels indicated by the BSL. The study highlights a critical issue where infrastructure classified as suitable may still present considerable stress for cyclists. The GIS-based approach provides a valuable tool for urban planners to identify areas needing improvement, aiming to create more bicycle-friendly cities. Ultimately, the research underscores the necessity for a comprehensive strategy that goes beyond basic assessments to effectively mitigate factors contributing to cycling stress, thereby fostering sustainable urban mobility.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, T., Pirdavani, A., Wets, G., & Janssens, D. (2024). Bicycle Infrastructure Design Principles in Urban Bikeability Indices: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 16 (6), 2545.
Ahsan, M., Shakeel, N. & Baig, F. (2023). Public perceptions of barriers to walk in urban areas of Lahore, Pakistan. TeMA -. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 16 (1), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/9353
Banister, D. (2008) the Sustainable Mobility Paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73-80.
Blanc, B., & Figliozzi, M. (2016). Modeling the Impacts of Facility Type, Trip Characteristics, and Trip Stressors on Cyclists’ Comfort Levels Utilizing Crowdsourced Data. Transportation Research Record, 2587 (1), 100-108.
Birk, M., Voros, K., Rose, M., Geller, R., Igarta, D., & Patterson, B. (2010). Cycle Zone Analysis : An Innovative Approach to Bicycle Planning. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting.
Callister, D., & Lowry, M. (2013). Tools and Strategies for Wide-Scale Bicycle Level-of-Service Analysis. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 139 (4), 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000155
Castanon, U. N., Ribeiro, P. J., & Mendes, J. C. (2024). Evaluating Urban Bikeability: A Comprehensive Assessment of Póvoa de Varzim’s Network. Sustainability, 16 (21), 9472.
Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Coffman, D. M., & Mi, Z. (2022). An environmental benefit analysis of bike sharing in New York City. Cities, 121, 103475.
D'Amico, A. (2023). New frontiers for sustainable mobility: MaaS (Mobility as a Service). TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 16 (2), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10039
Davis, J. (1987) Bicycle Safety Evaluation. Auburn University, City of Chattanooga, and Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission, Chattanooga.
Davis, S. (1995). Bicycle suitability rating (BSR) manual: A planning tool for selecting appropriate bicycle facilities. Bicycle Federation of America.
Dill, J. & Carr, T. (2003). Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them. Transportation Research: Part B, 1828, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.3141/1828-14
Duc-Nghiem, N., Tung, H. N., Kojima, A., & Kubota, H. (2017). Modeling cyclists' facility choice and its application in bike lane usage forecasting. The official Journal of the International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, 42 (2).
Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76 (3), 265-294.
Epperson, B. (1994) Evaluating Suitability of Roadways for Bicycle Use: Toward a Cycling Level-of-Service Standard. Transportation Research Board: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1438, 9-16
Emery, L. D., & Crump, S. A. (2003). Bicycle suitability assessment methodology: An integrated approach. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1823 (1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.3141/1823-10
Fenu, N. (2021). Bicycle and urban design. A lesson from Covid-19. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 14 (1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/7716
Fonseca, F., Ribeiro, P., & Neiva, C. (2023). A Planning Practice Method to Assess the Potential for Cycling and to Design a Bicycle Network in a Starter Cycling City in Portugal. Sustainability, 15 (5), 4534.
Forsyth, A., Krizek, K. J., Agrawal, A. W. & Stonebraker, E. (2013). Reliability testing of the Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey (PABS) method. J Phys Act Health. 9 (5):677-88.
Hardinghaus, M., Nieland, S., Lehne, M., & Weschke, J. (2021). More than Bike Lanes-A Multifactorial Index of Urban Bikeability. Sustainability, 13 (21), 11584.
Harkey, D. L., Reinfurt, D. W., & Knuiman, M. (1998). The Development of the Bicycle. Transportation Research Record, 1073 (1636), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3141/1636-03
İTU Transportation and Transportation Vehicles Applied Research Center. (2017). Eskisehir Transportation Master Plan Final Report (EUAP 2035). Eskisehir Metropolitan Municipality Transportation Master Plan Revision Study, İstanbul Technical University
Jones, S., & Carlson, D. (2003). Rural bicycle compatibility index (RBCI). In Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. (Paper No. 03-3456). Transportation Research Board.
Kon, F., Ferreira, E. C., Souza, H. A. d., Duarte, F., Santi, P., & Ratti, C. (2021). Abstracting mobility flows from bike-sharing systems. Public Transport, 14 (3), 545-581.
Landis, B. W. (1994). The bicycle interaction hazard score: A method for assessing bicycle compatibility on urban roadways. Transportation Research Record, 1438 (1), 38–48.
Liu, B., Bade, D., & Chow, J. Y. (2021). Bike count forecast model with multimodal network connectivity measures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675 (7), 320-334.
Liu, H., Ma, S., Chen, X., Wu, H., Wang, R., Du, M. & Nie, X. (2023). Diagnostic accuracy of the copenhagen index in ovarian malignancy: a meta-analysis. Plos One, 18 (6), e0286650.
Liu, Q., Yamada, T., Liu, H., Lin, L., and & Fang, Q. (2022). Healthy Behavior and Environmental Behavior Correlate with Bicycle Commuting. İnternational. Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (3318).
Lowry, M. B., Callister, D., & Gresham, M. (2012). Using Bicycle Level of Service to Assess Community-wide Bikeability. 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation. Washington, DC.
Lowry, M. B., Furth, P. & Hadden-Loh, T. (2016). Prioritizing new bicycle facilities to improve low-stress network connectivity. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 86, 124-140.
Mateu, G. & Sanz, A. (2021). Public Policies to Promote Sustainable Transports: Lessons from Valencia. Sustainability, 13 (3), 1141.
McCormack, G. R., Shiell, A. (2011). In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 13;8:125.
McNally, D., Tillinghast, R., & Iseki, H. (2022). Bicycle Accessibility GIS Analysis for Bike Master Planning with a Consideration of Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) and Energy Consumption. Sustainability, 15 (1), 42.
Murphy, B., & Owen, A. (2019). Implementing low-stress bicycle routing in national accessibility evaluation. Transportation Research Record, 2673 (5), 240-249.
Noel, G., O’Neill, A., & Sankar, A. (2003). Development and testing of the Compatibility of Roads for Cyclists (CRC) Index. TRB Annual Meeting. (Paper No. 03-3457). Transportation Research Board.
Pareek, P. S., & Parbhakar, K. (2018). Bicycle & Pedestrian Perceived Level Of Traffic Stress For Urban Area. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 2349-5138.
Pucher, J., Dill, J., & Handy, S. (2010). Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine, 106-125.
Rodrigue, J. P. (2016). The Geography of Transport Systems (4th ed.). Routledge.
San Francisco Public Health Department. (2009). Bicycle Environmental Quality Index (BEQI) methodology and initial assessment. San Francisco Department of Public Health.
Sorton, A. (1995). Measuring the Bicyclist Stress Level of Streets. Civil Engineers Key to the World Infrastructure, 1080-1083.
Sorton, A., & Walsh, T. (1994). Bicycle Stress Level as a Tool to Evaluate Urban and Suburban Bicycle Compatibility. Transportation Research Record, 19-22.
Stults-Kolehmainen, M.A. & Sinha, R. (2013). The Effects of Stress on Physical Activity and Exercise. Sports Med 44, 81–121.
Turkish Statistical Institute. (2024). Number of motor land vehicles by province.
Turkish Statistical Institute. (2024). Population and Demography.
Turner, S., Schafer, S., & Stewart, W. (1997). Bicycle Suitability Criteria: Literature Review and State of The Practice Survey. Austin, Texas.
Van Dyck, D., Cerin, E., Conway, T.L., et al. (2012) Perceived Neighborhood Environmental Attributes Associated with Adults’ Transport-Related Walking and Cycling: Findings from the USA, Australia and Belgium. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 70.
Wang, J., & Lindsey, G. (2017). Equity of Bikeway Distribution in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Transportation Research Record, 2605 (1), 18-31.
Yang, X., McCoy, E., Vich, G., Anaya-Boig, E., Avila-Palencia, I., Brand, C., Carrasco-Turigas, G., Dons, E., Gerike, R., Götschi, T., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Orjuela, J. P., Int Panis, L., Standaert, A., & de Nazelle, A. (2021). Air pollution, greenspace and active travel infrastructure impacts on stress while walking, cycling, or in motorized transport. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2021 (1).
Zolnik, E., & Cromley, E. K. (2007). A bicycle level-of-service index for suburban roadway segments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41 (10), 918–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.03.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 İlker Atmaca, Saye Nihan Çabuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
