Collecting Distributed Knowledge For Community’s Smart Changes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/1931Keywords:
policy innovation, socio technical system, crowd-sourcing, collective learningAbstract
The paper deals with the role of ICT in innovating government’s and the whole process of “policy production process”.By enhancing the connections between various governmental and social organizations, ICT supported knowledge flow s and the associated Socio Technical System may be a vehicle to support innovation in the public sector. In fact, they would enable governments to better cope with the uncertainties of a complex environment.
The MIDA Project carried out in the territory of Asti Province (Piedmont) can be considered as an attempt to engage in building such as a system.
The Project uses a crowd sourcing approach and it involves citizens in collecting data concerning broadband coverage, Internet access and usages.
From a research standpoint, MIDA represented an opportunity to test the role of Internet as a dynamic collaborative environment where statistically relevant data and interpreted information could be merged.
In terms of policy, the project stood as an opportunity for the local government to engage itself in a new policy approach to grasp people’s needs and improve service delivery.
The paper deals with the role of ICT in innovating government’s and the whole process of “policy production process”.
By enhancing the connections between various governmental and social organizations, ICT supported knowledge flow s and the associated Socio Technical System may be a vehicle to support innovation in the public sector. In fact, they would enable governments to better cope with the uncertainties of a complex environment.
The MIDA Project carried out in the territory of Asti Province (Piedmont) can be considered as an attempt to engage in building such as a system.
The Project uses a crowd sourcing approach and it involves citizens in collecting data concerning broadband coverage, Internet access and usages.
From a research standpoint, MIDA represented an opportunity to test the role of Internet as a dynamic collaborative environment where statistically relevant data and interpreted information could be merged.
In terms of policy, the project stood as an opportunity for the local government to engage itself in a new policy approach to grasp people’s needs and improve service delivery.Downloads
References
Australian Government Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research. (2011). Measuring Innovation in the Public Sector: A literary review, retrieved from http://www.gos.gov.uk/497296/docs/191913/237644/rss8.pdf.
Berra M. (2007). Sociologia delle reti telematiche. Bari, IT : Laterza.
Castells M. (2004). Informationalism, networks, and the network society: a theoretical blueprint. In Castells M. (ed.), The Network Society. A cross cultural perspective (pp.3-43), Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar .
Centeno C., van Revel R., Burgleman J.-C. (2005). A Prospective View of e-Government in the European Union. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3(2), 83-90. Retrieved from http://www.ejeg.com/volume3/issue2/p83
Davoudi S. (2012). Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End? Planning, Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Flanagin A.J, Metzger M.J. (2008). The credibility of volunteered geographic information, GeoJournal, 72, 137-148. doi: 10.1007/s10708-008-9188-y
Galletta D., Zhang P. (Eds.) (2006). Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
Gil-Garcia J.R. (2012). Enacting Electronic Government Success. New York , NY: Springer.
Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: web 2.0 and the volunteering of geographic information, GeoFocus, 7, 8-10, retrieved from http://geofocus.rediris.es/2007/ Editorial3_2007.pdf.
IBM (2013). How to re-invent the city, retrieved from http://smartercitieschallenge.org/executive_reports/IBM-SCC-How-to-Reinvent-a-City-Jan-2013-v2.pdf.
Inguaggiato C., Occelli S. (2012). Policy making in an information wired environment: re-aligning government and governance relationships by complexity thinking. Bruxelles, BE: Satellite Meeting, Complexity in the real world, ECCS 2012, September 5-6. retrieved from http://crweccs.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/bruxelles_sm_ 2012presentazione.pps
McIntyire J. (2003). Participatory Design: The Community of Practice (COP) Approach and Its Relevance to Strategic Management and Ethical Governance, Journal of SocioCybernetics, 4(1), 1-22.
Maier-Rabler U., Huber S. (2011). “open”: the changing relation between citizens, public administration, and political authority. jeDEM, 3(2), 182-191. Retrieved from htpp//www.jede.org.
Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2011). Identifying the multi-dimensional problem space & co-creating an enabling environment. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 13 (1-2), 3-25.
Nam T., Pardo T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions. College Park, MD: 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2037556.
Nam T., Pardo T. A. (2012). Transforming City Government: A Case Study of Philly311. Albany. NY: 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2012) . Retrieved October 22-25, 2012 from http://www.ctg.albany.edu/ publications/journals/icegov_ 2012_ philly311/ icegov_2012_philly311.pdf.
Navarra D.D., Cornford T. (2007). The State, Democracy and the Limits of New Public Management: Exploring Alternative Models of Egovernment, (Working Paper 155). London , UK: London School of Economics and Political Science.
NESTA (2008). Innovation in Government Organizations, Public Sector Agencies and Public Service NGOs. London, UK: LSE Public Policy Group.
Nograsek J. (2011) Change Management as a Critical Success Factor in e-Government Implementation. Business System Research , 2(2), 1-56. Retrieved from http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bsrj.2011.2.issue-2/v10305-012-0016-y/v10305-012-0016-y.xml.
OASIS. (2011). Transformational Government Framework Primer Version 1.0 retrieved October 2011 from http://lenand.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/tgprimer1-0.pdf.
Occelli S. (2006). A Framework for a reflexive information wired environment. Bordeaux, FR: Cognitica - Actes du Colloque de l’Association pour la Recherche Cognitive, 111-122.
Occelli S. (2008). Probing an Information Wired Environment in Italy’s Piedmont Region. Journal of Urban Technology, 15 (2), 95-114.
Occelli S. (2012a). ICT for policy innovation: empowering the policy production process. In Campagna M., De Montis A., Isola F., Lai S., Pira C., Zoppi C. (eds) (2012). Planning Support Tools: Policy Analysis, Implementation and Evaluation. Milano, IT: Franco Angeli.
Occelli S. (2012b). Socio Technical Systems and Policy Activity: Some Evidence From the Piedmont Region. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 4, 59-72. Retrieved from www.igi-global.com/journal/international-journal-planning-research-ijepr/44994.
PICTO. (2012). Le ICT nella costruzione della Società del Piemonte. Rapporto 2011. Torino, IT: Ires Piemonte. Retrieved from www.osservatorioict.regione.piemonte.it.
PICTO. (2013). Le ICT nei percorsi di innovazione del sistema regionale. Rapporto 2012. Torino, IT: Ires Piemonte. Retrieved from www.osservatorioict.regione.piemonte.it.
PICTO-CRC. (2012). I Comuni nella Società dell'Informazione. Rapporto 2011. Torino, IT: PICTO. Retrieved from www.osservatorioict.piemonte.it/it/images/phocadownload/ prodottiosservatorio/i%20comuni%20nella%20societ%20dellinformazione%202011.pdf.
Quitney Anderson J., Rainie L. (2010). The future of social relationships. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/The-future-of-social-relations.aspx.
Rhodes M.L., Murphy J., Muir J., Murray, J.A. (2011). Public Management and Complexity Theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
Scholl H.J. (2003). E-government: A Special Case of ICT-enabled Business Process Change. Hawaii, HI: 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Swederberg D., Douglas J. (2003). Transformation by Design. An innovative Approach to Implementation of e-Government. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2(1), 1-10. Retrieved from www.ejeg.com/issue/ download.html?idArticle=213.
van Dijk J., Winters-van Beek A. (2009) The Perspective of Network Government. The Struggle Between Hierarchies, Markets and Networks as Modes of Governance in Contemporary Government. In Meier A., Boersma K., Wagenaar P. (eds.) ICTs, Citizens & Governance: after the Hype! (pp 235-255). Amsterdam, NL: IOS Press series.
Wellman B. (2002). Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism, in: van den Besselaar P., Ishida T. (eds.) Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science: The State of the Art Series (pp. 11). Berlin DE: Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
