Participation of women in post-tsunami reconstruction processes in the Chilean Biobio Region coastal area

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/2281-4574/5060

Keywords:

Natural Disaster, Gender, Resilience, Social Resilience

Abstract

Women, girls, boys and men belonging to different age and socio-economic strata have distinct vulnerabilities to face natural disaster, which also affects their ability to recover from it. Systematic inequalities, overall exacerbate the impact of disaster and climate change effects, and hinder sustainable development. However, women play a central role in rebuilding homes and communities after a disaster. In this paper, the case of the post-disaster reconstruction of the coastal areas of the Biobio Region in Chile, affected by the earthquake and tsunami of February 27th 2010, is presented, placing emphasis on the role of women during the process. The disaster, despite the destruction and human losses caused, also provides the opportunity to rebuild affected communities by reducing pre-event vulnerabilities. When considering gender-based vulnerability to hazards, women have demonstrated more ability to capitalize on the social and cultural potential that arose after the catastrophe to improve their original conditions.
The case study shows that women have known how to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the reconstruction process. This demonstrates that women, if given the tools and a socio-cultural context that allows them to have an even playing field, can be the base on which to build communities that are more resilient to face the changes produced by natural events.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Birkmann J. (2006), “Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: towards disaster resilient societies”, The Energy, S.l., s.n. ISBN 8179931226.

Castro García C.(2005),“La inequidad de género en la gestión integral del riesgo de desastre. Un acercamiento”, Revista de la Universidad Cristóbal Colón, 20, pp. 1-28.

Cutter, S. L. (1996), “Vulnerability to environmental hazards”. Progress in Human Geography, 20, 529-539.

Cutter, S.L., Ash, K.D. y Emrich, C.T.(2014), “The geographies of community disaster resilience”. Global Environmental Change [en línea], 29, pp. 65-77. ISSN 0959-3780. DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005.

Eklund, L. y Tellier, S.(2012), “Gender and international crisis response: Do we have the data, and does it matter?” Disasters, 36, 4, pp. 589-608. ISSN 03613666. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01276.x.

Fordham, M. (2011), “Gender and Disasters”, Encyclopedia of Environmental Health [en línea], no. April, pp. 834-838. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52272-6.00475-X. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978044452272600475X.

GFDRR(2015), Resilient Recovery: An Imperative for Sustainable Development, Washington.

Habtezion, S. (2013), UNICEF and Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations Development Programme [en línea]. S.l.: Disponible en: www.undp.org/gender.

IASC(2006), Women, Girls, Boys and Men: Different Needs - Equal Opportunities. IASC Gender Handbook in Humanitarian Action, Inter-Agency Standing Committee [en línea], no. December. Disponible en: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/46978c842.html.

Juran L. y Trivedi J.(2015), “Women, Gender Norms, and Natural Disasters in Bangladesh”, Geographical Review, 105, 4, pp. 601-611. ISSN 19310846 00167428. DOI 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2015.12089.x.

Stuven, A.M., Cabello, T., Crisóstomo, B. y Lozier, M.(2013), La mujer ayer y hoy: un recorrido de incorporación social y política, Temas de la agenda pública, 61. ISSN 0718-9745.

UNISDR (2004), Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. S.l.: s.n. ISBN 9211010500.

Published

2017-04-03