Gender equality and the City: a methodological approach to mobility in space-time

Authors

  • Margarida Queirós Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, Geographic Studies Centre, University of Lisbon
  • Nuno Marques da Costa
  • Paulo Morgado
  • Mário Vale
  • Júlia Guerreiro
  • Fabio Rodrigues
  • Nelson Mileu
  • Aníbal Almeida

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/2281-4574/5061

Keywords:

Gender equality, mobility in space-time, VGI, telegeomonitoring

Abstract

Telecommunications and geotechnology (electronic devices, computers and software, communicating with each other in real time) nowadays form the backbone of urban structures that support the everyday lives of people around the world. Despite their recognized role, little attention has been given to the social and gender impacts of these techno-urban systems, and little has been questioned about how they can be used to foster more inclusive and equitable mobility policies with the participation of communities. On the other hand, mobility is one of the great challenges that institutions face, and research related to gender imbalance in the everyday use of space-time is scarce.
Deepening knowledge about mobility and the use of time by women and men in Portugal, the research that led to this article used the methodology of real-time monitoring of a (business) day of workers in order to examine their commuting patterns. To this end, and relying on volunteers, smartphones and/or devices with embedded GPS (trackers) were used for data acquisition. The results demonstrate the feasibility and relevance of the methodology (telegeomonitoring of commutes), highlight gender inequalities in mobility and time use, and help encourage more inclusive social policies and work-life balance tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aboím S. (2010), “Gender cultures and the division of labour in contemporary Europe”, The Sociological Review, 58(2), pp 171–196.

Acierno A. (2016), “Reading the New Urban Agenda in a gender perspective”, TRIA, 16(1/2016), pp 5-10.

Boccia T. (2016), “Habitat III: theories and practices of the women facing the global challenges in cities”, TRIA 16(1/2016), pp 17-20.

Capel H. (2016), “Pensar en ciudades habitables para el futuro”, Finisterra Revista Portuguesa de Geografia, LI(101), pp 25-43.

Denzin N. K. (1978), “Sociological Methods”, New York, McGraw-Hill.

EIGE (2013), “Reconciliation of Work and Family Life as a Condition of Equal Participation in the Labour Market”, Report, European Institute for Gender Equality. (http://eige.europa.eu).

EIGE (2015), “Supporting reconciliation of work, family and private life. Good Practices”, European Institute for Gender Equality, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union. (http://eige.europa.eu).

Eurostat (2004), “How Europeans spend their time. Every day life of women and men. Data 1988-2002”, Eurostat Theme 3 Population and Social Conditions, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the Europeans Communities.

Eurostat (2006), “Statistics in Focus. Population and social conditions, How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe?”, European Communities.

Eurostat (2009), “Harmonised European Time Use Surveys. 2008 Guidelines”. Collection: Methodologies and working papers Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications EU.

Fraser Taylor D. R.; Lauriault Tracey P. (eds.) (2014), “Developments in the Theory and Practice of the Cybercartography”. Applications and indigenous mapping, London, Elsevier.

Gaspar J., Queirós M., Marques da Costa N., Brito Henriques E. (2009), “Estudo de Diagnóstico e Criação de Indicadores de Género na Área do Território e Ambiente”, Lisboa: CEG, Universidade de Lisboa/FLUL & CIG http://www.igualdade.gov.pt/images/stories/documentos/documentacao/relatorios/relatorio_genero_territorio_ambiente.pdf).

Goodchild M. F. (2007), “Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography”, Geojournal, 69, pp 211-221.

Goodchild M. F. (2008), “Commentary: whither VGI?”, GeoJournal, 72(3), pp 239-244.

Greed C. (2012), “Planning for sustainable transport or for people’s needs”, Urban Design and Planning, Volume 165, DP4, pp 219–229 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/udap.10.00033).

Greenfield A., Shepard M. (2007), “Urban Computing and Its Discontents”, Architecture and Situated Technologies Pamphlet 1, New York, The Architectural League of New York.

Hanlon S. (1996), “Where do women feature in public transport?” Women’s Travel Issues Second National Conference, Baltimore, October 1996.

Hasson Y., Polevoy M. (2011), “Gender Equality Initiatives in Transportation Policy, A review of the Literature”, Women’s Budget Forum, Heinrich Boell Stiftung, European Union, Hadassah Foundation.

Knafl K., Breitmayer B. J. (1989), “Triangulation in qualitative research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose”. In J. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 193-203). Rockville, MD, Aspen.

Krefting L. (1991), “Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness”, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, pp 214-222.

Madariaga I. S. (2013), “Mobility of Care: introducing new concepts in urban transport”, In Sánchez de Madariaga, Inés, Roberts, Marion, Fair Shared Cities, The impact of gender planning in Europe, England and USA, Ashgate, pp 33-48.

Miller, H. J. (2005), “A Measurement Theory for Time Geography”, Geographical Analysis, 37, pp 17–45.

Neutens T.; Schwanen T.; Witlox F. (2011), “The Prism of Everyday Life: Towards a New Research Agenda for Time Geography”, Transport Reviews, 31(1), pp 25–47.

Queirós M., Marques da Costa N. (2012), “Knowledge on Gender Dimensions of Transportation in Portugal”, Dialogue and UniversalismE, 3(1), pp 47-69.

Shin D. H. (2009), “Ubiquitous city: Urban technologies, urban infrastructure and urban informatics”, Journal of Information Science, 35(5), pp 515-526.

Tavora I., Rubery J. (2013), “Female employment, labour market institutions and gender culture in Portugal”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 19(3), pp 221–237.

Townsend A. M. (2013), “Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia”, W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-03

Issue

No. 17 (2016): Engendering Habitat III: Facing the Global Challenges in Cities

Section

Articoli

License

Gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano le seguenti condizioni:

  1. Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l'opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
  2. Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
  3. Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell'opera pubblicata (Vedi The Effect of Open Access).