Marine mammals in the Gulf of Gaeta: an updated checklist with historical data

Authors

  • Nicola Maio Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italia
  • Francesco Pollaro Centro Studi Ecosistemi Mediterranei, Perdifumo (Salerno), Italia
  • Adriano Madonna Associazione Internazionale Progetti Ulisse, Sperlonga - Minturno (Latina), Italia / Scuola Superiore di Tecnologia per il Mare – ITS Academy “G. Caboto” (Gaeta, Latina), Italia
  • Luigi Valerio Associazione Internazionale Progetti Ulisse, Sperlonga - Minturno (Latina), Italia
  • Agnese Petraccioli Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italia
  • Valerio Manfrini Associazione Zoönomia, 40100 Bologna, Italia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6093/2724-4393/12228

Keywords:

marine mammals, cetaceans, Mediterranean monk seal, gulf, checklist

Abstract

This work contains historical and modern records of marine mammals observed in the Gulf of Gaeta (Italy, Central Tyrrhenian). Eleven species of cetaceans were sighted, representing about 58% of the Italian and about 46% of the Mediterranean cetofauna. Four species are regularly sighted: Balaenoptera physalus, Physeter macrocephalus, Stenella coeruleoalba, and Tursiops truncatus. Ziphius cavirostris, Orcinus orca, and Grampus griseus are rare. Two species – Eschrichtius robustus
and Megaptera novaeangliae – are occasional, while sightings of Globicephala melas and Delphinus delphis seem to have decreased dramatically based on recent surveys. The Monachus monachus presence, recorded with certainty in the past, is now to be ruled out. Recent sightings without photos that confirm the correct identification are to be considered doubtful

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Marine mammals in the Gulf of Gaeta: an updated checklist with historical data

Published

2025-05-16

How to Cite

Maio, N., Pollaro, F., Madonna, A., Valerio, L., Petraccioli, A., & Manfrini, V. (2025). Marine mammals in the Gulf of Gaeta: an updated checklist with historical data. Bulletin of Regional Natural History, 4(3), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.6093/2724-4393/12228