Poliziano’s Intertextual Engagement with the Classics: The Role of Macrobius in His Annotations on the Aeneid

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6093/2974-637X/12904

Keywords:

Poliziano, Virgil, Macrobius, Humanism, Reception

Abstract

Poliziano’s interest in Macrobius can be clearly traced throughout his work on the exegesis of classical texts. In the unpublished marginal notes that Poliziano wrote as a commentary on the Aeneid, preserved in the incunabulum Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Rés. G. Yc. 236 (ISTC iv00151400), the engagement with Macrobius’ texts is systemat-ic. In this paper, I aim to provide a few examples of Poliziano’s reading of Macrobius’ Saturnalia, which highlight Virgil’s imitative technique.

Author Biography

Lorenzo Vespoli, Justus Liebig-Universität Gießen

Lorenzo Vespoli (b. 1996) earned his Master’s degree in Ancient Studies from the University of Genoa (2020) and his PhD in Latin Language and Literature from the University of Geneva (2024). His research focuses on intertextual techniques in Latin literature and on the reception of classical texts in the Renaissance. In 2024 he edited for Olschki the critical edition of Angelo Poliziano’s (1454–1494) annotations on Virgil’s Eclogues, and in 2025 he prepared for Rusconi an edition with Italian translation and notes of Plutarch’s Life of Cicero.

Published

2025-12-04

How to Cite

Vespoli, L. (2025). Poliziano’s Intertextual Engagement with the Classics: The Role of Macrobius in His Annotations on the Aeneid. CESURA - Rivista, 4(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.6093/2974-637X/12904